UNLIMITED FREE ACCESS TO THE WORLD'S BEST IDEAS

close
Already an Engineering360 user? Log in.

This is embarrasing...

An error occurred while processing the form. Please try again in a few minutes.

Customize Your Engineering360 Experience

close
Privacy Policy

This is embarrasing...

An error occurred while processing the form. Please try again in a few minutes.

PPI TN-16

Rate Process Method for Projecting Performance of Polyethylene Piping Components

active, Most Current
Buy Now
Organization: PPI
Publication Date: 1 July 2008
Status: active
Page Count: 8
scope:

Introduction

The PPI Hydrostatic Stress Board (HSB) conducted an extensive evaluation of various methods for forecasting the effective long-term performance of polyethylene (PE) thermoplastic piping materials. Basically, these methods require elevated temperature sustained pressure testing of pipe where the type of failure is of the slit or brittle-like mode. Details of this evaluation and conclusions are contained in reference 1.

As a result of this study, HSB determined that the three-coefficient rate process method (RPM) equation provided the best correlation between calculated long-term performance projections and known field performance of several PE piping materials. It also had the best probability for extrapolation of data based on the statistical "lack of fit" test.

The Rate Process Method (RPM), which was developed out of this study, was incorporated in two ASTM standards. ASTM D 2837 (2) added a "validation" requirement for PE piping materials, and ASTM D 2513 (3) added a validation requirement for the pipe producer. Since some high performance PE materials do not exhibit SCG (slit or brittle-like failure) under elevated temperature testing, the RPM method can not be applied to these materials for the established validation methods. The ASTM standard test method for determining chlorine resistance of PEX tubing, ASTM F 2023 (4), uses the Rate Process Method for its projected performance calculations.

Provided that the RPM method is applied to materials that demonstrate SCG (slit or brittle-like failure) resin and pipe producers, as well as end-users, may apply RPM calculations to make relative judgments on specific materials and/or piping products. One example has been to use the RPM to estimate projected life of SCG-susceptible PE pipe exhumed from buried service. Projections from the Rate Process Method for this exhumed PE gas pipe were shown to have very good correlation with actual field failures from three gas companies (5). These projections are based on the primary load, which is the internal pressure. RPM can also be used to determine the effects of secondary loads such as indentation (rock impingement), bending, deflection or squeeze-off.

Document History

PPI TN-16
July 1, 2008
Rate Process Method for Projecting Performance of Polyethylene Piping Components
Introduction The PPI Hydrostatic Stress Board (HSB) conducted an extensive evaluation of various methods for forecasting the effective long-term performance of polyethylene (PE) thermoplastic piping...
December 1, 1999
Rate Process Method for Projecting Performance of Polyethylene Piping Components
A description is not available for this item.
January 1, 1992
Rate Process Method for Evaluating Performance of Polyethylene Pipe
A description is not available for this item.

References

Advertisement