UNLIMITED FREE
ACCESS
TO THE WORLD'S BEST IDEAS

SUBMIT
Already a GlobalSpec user? Log in.

This is embarrasing...

An error occurred while processing the form. Please try again in a few minutes.

Customize Your GlobalSpec Experience

Finish!
Privacy Policy

This is embarrasing...

An error occurred while processing the form. Please try again in a few minutes.

NASA-LLIS-2048

Lessons Learned – Autonomous Transfer to Reaction Wheel Control May Lead to Safing Instability

active, Most Current
Organization: NASA
Publication Date: 14 April 2009
Status: active
Page Count: 4
scope:

Abstract:

In-flight the EPOXI spacecraft exhibited a safe mode instability after a portion of the torque distribution was assigned to a reaction wheel that had been powered down. It was determined that safing assumes that all wheels are operational and does not check the power state of each wheel. It would not significantly increase flight software complexity for safing to check the status of each wheel. Safing designers should also consider avoiding reliance on a software flag to activate a set of RWAs, disabling auxiliary controllers while in safe mode, avoiding autonomous switching from thruster to RWA control, disabling unnecessary attitude control performance enhancement features while in safe mode, and scrutinizing new features that may have unintended consequences when added to heritage systems.

Document History

NASA-LLIS-2048
April 14, 2009
Lessons Learned – Autonomous Transfer to Reaction Wheel Control May Lead to Safing Instability
Abstract: In-flight the EPOXI spacecraft exhibited a safe mode instability after a portion of the torque distribution was assigned to a reaction wheel that had been powered down. It was determined...

References

Advertisement