scope:

INTRODUCTION

This Framework of Guidance for Building Good Digital Collections has three purposes:

1. To provide an overview of some of the major components and activities involved in creating good digital collections.

2. To identify existing resources that support the development of sound local practices for creating and managing good digital collections.

3. To encourage community participation in the ongoing development of best practices for digital collection building.

It is intended for two audiences:

• cultural heritage organizations planning and implementing initiatives to create digital collections; and

• funding organizations that want to encourage the development of good digital collections.

The use of the word "good" in this context requires some explanation. In the early days of digitization, a collection could be considered good if it provided proof of concept or resulted in new institutional capabilities-even if the resulting collection itself was short-lived or of minimal usefulness to the organization's users.

As the digital environment matured, the focus of digital collection-building efforts shifted toward the creation of useful and relevant collections that served the needs of one or more communities of users. The bar of "goodness" was raised to include levels of usability, accessibility, and fitness for use appropriate to the anticipated user group(s).

Digital collection development has now evolved and matured to a third stage, where simply serving useful digital collections effectively to a known constituency is not sufficient. Issues of cost/value, sustainability, and trust have emerged as critical success criteria for good digital collections. Objects, metadata, and collections must now be viewed not only within the context of the projects that created them, but as building blocks that others can reuse, repackage, repurpose, and build services upon. "Goodness" now demands interoperability, reusability, persistence, verification, documentation, and support for intellectual property rights.

In edition three of this Framework we acknowledge that digital collections increasingly contain born-digital objects, as opposed to digital objects that were derived through the digitization of analogue source materials. We also acknowledge that digital collection development has moved from being an ad hoc "extra" activity to a core service in many cultural heritage institutions.

Digital collections must now intersect with the user's own context-within the course, within the research process, within the leisure time activities, and within the social networks that are important to the end user.

Users-in particular the younger generations of users-have integrated digital technologies so completely into their lives that they are ready and even eager to move into a role as creators and collaborators. The rise of shared information spaces such as YouTube and Flickr; the popularity of social networking sites such as MySpace, Facebook, and LinkedIn; and the growth of the "mash-up" as the vehicle for new creativity demonstrate that good digital collection-building has become an active collaboration between the information professional and the user, resulting in collections that are reliable and authoritative, yet also compelling and useful to a wide range of users wherever they live, work, and play.

The Framework of Guidance provides criteria for goodness organized around four core types of entities:

• Collections (organized groups of objects)

• Objects (digital materials)

• Metadata (information about objects and collections)

• Initiatives (programs or projects to create and manage collections)

Note that services have been deliberately excluded as out of scope. It is expected that if quality collections, objects, and metadata are created, it will be possible for any number of higher-level services to make effective use and reuse of them.

For each of these four types of entities, general principles related to quality are defined and discussed, and supporting resources providing further information are identified. These resources may be standards, guidelines, best practices, explanations, discussions, clearinghouses, or examples.