UNLIMITED FREE ACCESS TO THE WORLD'S BEST IDEAS

close
Already an Engineering360 user? Log in.

This is embarrasing...

An error occurred while processing the form. Please try again in a few minutes.

Customize Your Engineering360 Experience

close
Privacy Policy

This is embarrasing...

An error occurred while processing the form. Please try again in a few minutes.

ISO TR 22930-2

Evaluating the performance of continuous air monitors — Part 2: Air monitors based on flow-through sampling techniques without accumulation

active, Most Current
Buy Now
Organization: ISO
Publication Date: 1 May 2020
Status: active
Page Count: 40
ICS Code (Radiation protection): 13.280
scope:

The use of a continuous air monitor (CAM) is mainly motivated by the need to be alerted quickly and in the most accurate way possible with an acceptable false alarm rate when significant activity concentration value is exceeded, in order to take appropriate measures to reduce exposure of those involved.

The performance of this CAM does not only depend on the metrological aspect characterized by the decision threshold, the limit of detection and the measurement uncertainties but also on its dynamic capacity characterized by its response time as well as on the minimum detectable activity concentration corresponding to an acceptable false alarm rate.

The ideal performance is to have a minimum detectable activity concentration as low as possible associated with a very short response time, but unfortunately these two criteria are in opposition. It is therefore important that the CAM and the choice of the adjustment parameters and the alarm levels be in line with the radiation protection objectives.

This document describes

- the dynamic behaviour and the determination of the response time,

- the determination of the characteristic limits (decision threshold, detection limit, limits of the coverage interval), and

- a possible way to determine the minimum detectable activity concentration and the alarms setup.

Finally the annexes of this document show actual examples of CAM data which illustrate how to quantify the CAM performance by determining the response time, the characteristics limits, the minimum detectable activity concentration and the alarms setup.

Document History

ISO TR 22930-2
May 1, 2020
Evaluating the performance of continuous air monitors — Part 2: Air monitors based on flow-through sampling techniques without accumulation
The use of a continuous air monitor (CAM) is mainly motivated by the need to be alerted quickly and in the most accurate way possible with an acceptable false alarm rate when significant activity...

References

Advertisement