UNLIMITED FREE
ACCESS
TO THE WORLD'S BEST IDEAS

SUBMIT
Already a GlobalSpec user? Log in.

This is embarrasing...

An error occurred while processing the form. Please try again in a few minutes.

Customize Your GlobalSpec Experience

Finish!
Privacy Policy

This is embarrasing...

An error occurred while processing the form. Please try again in a few minutes.

WRC - BULLETIN 119

INTERPRETIVE REPORT ON PRESSURE VESSEL HEADS; INTERPRETATIONS OF EXPERIMENTAL DATA ON PRESSURE VESSEL HEADS CONVEX TO PRESSURE

active, Most Current
Organization: WRC
Publication Date: 1 January 1967
Status: active
scope:

The state of the art of pressure vessel design has recently been summarized by Langer. He discussed the different types of pressure vessel heads, the main characteristics of each type, and the relative validity of the ASME Code rules that pertain to each type. It was shown that present code rules are, in general, overly conservative for thick-walled heads, and in some cases, unconservative for thinwalled heads. Regarding the latter statement Shield and Drucker,2 writing in 1959, stated that a certain class of ASME Code torispherical vessels were "positively unsafe." On the same subject, Galletly warned of the inadequacy of codedesigned thin-walled torispherical heads in 1956. A revision of the ASME Code for Design of Pressure Vessel Heads is definitely in order. The purpose of the present report is to comment briefly on recent research developments, to give specific proposals and suggestions for future research work, and to suggest a philosophy of design which can lead to a more rational and uniform Code for pressure vessel heads.

Document History

BULLETIN 119
January 1, 1967
INTERPRETIVE REPORT ON PRESSURE VESSEL HEADS; INTERPRETATIONS OF EXPERIMENTAL DATA ON PRESSURE VESSEL HEADS CONVEX TO PRESSURE
The state of the art of pressure vessel design has recently been summarized by Langer. He discussed the different types of pressure vessel heads, the main characteristics of each type, and the...
Advertisement