UNLIMITED FREE
ACCESS
TO THE WORLD'S BEST IDEAS

SUBMIT
Already a GlobalSpec user? Log in.

This is embarrasing...

An error occurred while processing the form. Please try again in a few minutes.

Customize Your GlobalSpec Experience

Finish!
Privacy Policy

This is embarrasing...

An error occurred while processing the form. Please try again in a few minutes.

WRC - BULLETIN 434

DESIGN AND INSERVICE MARGINS OF POWER PIPING SYSTEMS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF U. S., CANADIAN AND EUROPEAN CODES & STANDARDS

active, Most Current
Organization: WRC
Publication Date: 1 August 1998
Status: active
scope:

This bulletin compares US, UK, Canada, France Germany, Holland, Norway and Sweden codes and standards for the design of piping systems in power plants. The comparison includes fossil and non-safety nuclear power plant piping, and nuclear safety power plant piping where they exist. The review focuses on design equations for sizing and stress qualification of power piping. Difference in material and construction are not addressed. Each of the applicable codes and standards are discussed separately in Sections 3 through 9, and Section 10 illustrates some of the differences between design equations by applying various rules to the same pipe and loading. A listing of in-service codes and standards for piping is provided in Section 11. The work was co-sponsored by PVRC and the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Publication of this document - WRC Bulletin 434 was sponsored by the Pressure Vessel Research Council of the Welding Research Council

Document History

BULLETIN 434
August 1, 1998
DESIGN AND INSERVICE MARGINS OF POWER PIPING SYSTEMS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF U. S., CANADIAN AND EUROPEAN CODES & STANDARDS
This bulletin compares US, UK, Canada, France Germany, Holland, Norway and Sweden codes and standards for the design of piping systems in power plants. The comparison includes fossil and non-safety...
Advertisement