When two dissimilar metals in electrical contact are exposed to a common electrolyte, one of the metals can undergo increased corrosion while the other can show decreased corrosion. This type of accelerated corrosion is referred to as galvanic corrosion. Because galvanic corrosion can occur at a high rate, it is important that a means be available to alert the user of products or equipment that involve the use of dissimilar metal combinations in an electrolyte of the possible effects of galvanic corrosion.
One method that is used to predict the effects of galvanic corrosion is to develop a galvanic series by arranging a list of the materials of interest in order of observed corrosion potentials in the environment and conditions of interest. The metal that will suffer increased corrosion in a galvanic couple in that environment can then be predicted from the relative position of the two metals in the series.
Types of Galvanic Series:
Oe type of Galvanic Series lists the metals of interest in order of their corrosion potentials, starting with the most active (electronegative) and proceeding in order to the most noble (electropositive). The potentials themselves (versus an appropriate reference half-cell) are listed so that the potential difference between metals in the series can be determined. This type of Galvanic Series has been put in graphical form as a series of bars displaying the range of potentials exhibited by the metal listed opposite each bar. Such a series is illustrated in Fig. 1.
The second type of galvanic series is similar to the first in that it lists the metals of interest in order of their corrosion potentials. The actual potentials themselves are not specified, however. Thus, only the relative position of materials in the series is known and not the magnitude of their potential difference. Such a series is shown in Fig. 2.
Use of a Galvanic Series:
Generally, upon coupling two metals in the Galvanic Series, the more active (electronegative) metal will have a tendency to undergo increased corrosion while the more noble (electropositive) metal will have a tendency to undergo reduced corrosion.
Usually, the further apart two metals are in the series, and thus the greater the potential difference between them, the greater is the driving force for galvanic corrosion. All other factors being equal, and subject to the precautions in Section 5, this increased driving force frequently, although not always, results in a greater degree of galvanic corrosion.
Note-Dark boxes indicate active behavior of active-passive alloys.
FIG. 1 Galvanic Series of Various Metals in Flowing Seawater at 2.4 to 4.0 m/s for 5 to 15 Days at 5 to 30°C (Redrawn from Original) (see Footnote 5)
ACTIVE END | Magnesium |
(−) | Magnesium Alloys |
↑ | Zinc |
¦ | Galvanized Steel |
¦ | Aluminum 1100 |
¦ | Aluminum 6053 |
¦ | Alclad |
¦ | Cadmium |
¦ | Aluminum 2024 (4.5 Cu, 1.5 Mg, 0.6 Mn) |
¦ | Mild Steel |
¦ | Wrought Iron |
¦ | Cast Iron |
¦ | 13 % Chromium Stainless Steel |
¦ | Type 410 (Active) |
¦ | 18-8 Stainless Steel |
¦ | Type 304 (Active) |
¦ | 18-12-3 Stainless Steel |
¦ | Type 316 (Active) |
¦ | Lead-Tin Solders |
¦ | Lead |
¦ | Tin |
¦ | Muntz Metal |
¦ | Manganese Bronze |
¦ | Naval Brass |
¦ | Nickel (Active) |
¦ | 76 Ni-16 Cr-7 Fe alloy (Active) |
¦ | 60 Ni-30 Mo-6 Fe-1 Mn |
¦ | Yellow Brass |
¦ | Admirality Brass |
¦Aluminum Brass |
¦ | Red Brass |
¦ | Copper |
¦ | Silicon Bronze |
¦ | 70:30 Cupro Nickel |
¦ | G-Bronze |
¦ | M-Bronze |
¦ | Silver Solder |
¦ | Nickel (Passive) |
¦ | 76 Ni-16Cr-7 Fe |
¦ | Alloy (Passive) |
¦ | 67 Ni-33 Cu Alloy (Monel) |
¦ | 13 % Chromium Stainless Steel |
¦ | Type 410 (Passive) |
¦ | Titanium |
¦ | 18-8 Stainless Steel |
¦ | Type 304 (Passive) |
¦ | 18-12-3 Stainless Steel |
↓ | Type 316 (Passive) |
(+) | Silver |
NOBLE or | Graphite |
PASSIVE END | Gold |
| Platinum |
FIG. 2 Galvanic Series of Various Metals Exposed to Seawater (see Footnote 3)
View Less