The success or failure of any attempt to forcefully penetrate a fence system is dependent upon three primary factors that collectively define the threat-the tools and devices employed, the number of aggressors, and their level of sophistication.
Normally, a test procedure of this scope would be supported by years of laboratory testing intended to qualify and accurately reproduce the destructive effects of a variety of tools, implements, and devices. However, rapidly changing social conditions have created an immediate need for building components resistant to evolving forced entry techniques. Accordingly, the procedures presented herein are based more on field experience than laboratory analysis. They are more representative than inclusive, are intended to provide a basis for the comparative evaluation of different fence systems using forced penetration procedures and are not intended to be used to establish or confirm the absolute prevention of forced entries.
TABLE 1 Schedule of Testing-All Levels of Threat Severity
|
| | Time of Application (minutes) |
| | Structured Testing | | Discretionary Testing |
| Tool(s) | | L | M | A | | L | M | A |
Crowbar
5 lb by 28 in. (2) | | 3-5 | 3-5 | 3-5 | | 0-55 | 0-55 | 0-55 |
Cold Chisels and
Hammer (2) | | 3-5 | 3-5 | 3-5 | | 0-55 | 0-55 | 0-55 |
Hacksaw and
Two HSS Blades | | 3-5 | 3-5 | 3-5 | | 0-55 | 0-55 | 0-55 |
Sledgehammer
16 in. by 6 lb | | 3-5 | 3-5 | 3-5 | | 0-55 | 0-55 | 0-55 |
Fire Axe
36 in. by 6 lb | | 3-5 | 3-5 | 3-5 | | 0-55 | 0-55 | 0-55 |
| Bolt Cutter (2) | | - | 3-5 | 3-5 | | - | 0-55 | 0-55 |
Fire Axe
36 in. by 10 lb | | - | 3-5 | 3-5 | | - | 0-55 | 0-55 |
| Hole Saw 2 in. (1) | | - | 0-5 | 0-5 | | - | 0-55 | 0-55 |
Pry Bar
30 in. Steel (2) | | - | 0-5 | 0-5 | | - | 0-55 | 0-55 |
Sledgehammer
30 in. by 12 lb | | - | 0-5 | 0-5 | | - | 0-55 | 0-55 |
Steel Wedge
6 in. long (2) | | - | 0-5 | 0-5 | | - | 0-55 | 0-55 |
Circular Saw
8 in., 1100 W, and
3 Blades (1) | | - | - | 0-5 | | - | - | 0-55 |
Disc Grinder
5 in., 1100 W, and 3 Blades (1) | | - | - | 0-5 | | - | - | 0-55 |
Rotary and
Hammer Drill
750 W and 5 Drill Bits, ½ in. (1) | | - | - | 0-5 | | - | - | 0-55 |
Hole Saw
Greater than 2 in. (1) | | - | - | 0-5 | | - | - | 0-55 |
Steel Pinch
Bar 60 in. long (2) | | - | - | 0-5 | | - | - | 0-55 |
Reciprocating
Saw 750 W and
3 Carbide Blades (1) | | - | - | 0-5 | | - | - | 0-55 |
Sledgehammer
30 in. by 15 lb (1) | | - | - | 0-5 | | - | - | 0-55 |
Oxyacetylene
Torch with 80 ft
3 Oxygen and
40 ft3 Acetylene Tanks (1) | | - | - | 0-5 | | - | - | 0-55 |
Cut-Off Saw
5 KW or HD Gasoline
18 in. Dia. and 3
Blades (1) | | - | - | 0-5 | | - | - | 0-55 |
Breaker
(1900 W) 30 lb with
3 Bits (1) | | - | - | 0-5 | | - | - | 0-55 |
Scissor Jack 1500 lb
with 4 in. min
retraction and 8 in.
Stroke (1) | | - | - | 0-5 | | - | - | 0-55 |
Adhesive
Tape (1) | | - | - | - | | 0-55 | 0-55 | 0-55 |
Fishing
Line (250') | | - | - | - | | 0-55 | 0-55 | 0-55 |
Grappling
Hook (1) | | - | - | - | | 0-55 | 0-55 | 0-55 |
| 5-in. Knife (1) | | - | - | - | | 0-55 | 0-55 | 0-55 |
8 in. Std and Self
Grip Pliers (2) | | - | - | - | | 0-55 | 0-55 | 0-55 |
10 in. Multiple
Slip Pliers (2) | | - | - | - | | 0-55 | 0-55 | 0-55 |
10 in. Pipe
Wrench (2) | | - | - | - | | 0-55 | 0-55 | 0-55 |
1.660 in. O.D. by 12 ft.
pipe (2) | | - | - | - | | 0-55 | 0-55 | 0-55 |
8 in. Plate
Shears (1) | | - | - | - | | 0-55 (1) | 0-55 (1) | 0-55 (2) |
Screwdrivers
7 in.,10 in., and 16 in. (1) | | - | - | - | | 0-55 | 0-55 | 0-55 |
Cordless ½ in. Drill with
spare power pack and
carbide bits (1) | | - | - | - | | 0-55 | 0-55 | 0-55 |
Butane
Torch (1) | | - | - | - | | 0-55 | 0-55 | 0-55 |
| Rope (1) | | - | - | - | | 0-55 | 0-55 | 0-55 |
TABLE 2 Forced Entry Resistant Ratings
| Threat Level | Active Test
Personnel | Resistance Time (minute) | Rating |
| Structured Test | Discretionary Test | Cumulative |
| Low (L) | 2 | Less than 5 | 0 | Less than 5 | L0 to L4.9 |
| | 5 | Less than 5 | Less than 10 | L5 to L9.9 |
| | 5 | 5 to 9.9 | Less than 15 | L10 to L14.9 |
| | 5 | 10 to 14.9 | Less than 20 | L15 to L19.9 |
| | 5 | 20 to 25 | 30 | L20 to L30 |
| | 5 | 31 to 55 | 60 | L31 to L60 |
| Medium (M) | 2 | Less than 5 | 0 | Less than 5 | M0 to M4.9 |
| | 5 | Less than 5 | Less than 10 | M5 to M9.9 |
| | 5 | 5 to 9.9 | Less than 15 | M10 to M14.9 |
| | 5 | 10 to 14.9 | Less than 20 | M15 to M19.9 |
| | 5 | 20 to 25 | 30 | M20 to M30 |
| | 5 | 31 to 55 | 60 | M31 to M60 |
| Aggressive (A) | 4 | Less than 5 | 0 | Less than 5 | A0 to A4.9 |
| | 5 | Less than 5 | Less than 10 | A5 to A9.9 |
| | 5 | 5 to 9.9 | Less than 15 | A10 to A14.9 |
| | 5 | 10 to 14.9 | Less than 15 | A15 to A19.9 |
| | 5 | 20 to 25 | 30 | A20 to A30 |
| | 5 | 31 to 55 | 60 | M31 to A60 |
The test requirements specified herein have been established for use in evaluating the penetration resistance characteristics of standard fence systems to be used in commercial, government and military installations.
The success of any forced entry threat is dependent on the cumulative effect of the implements used, the elapsed time, and the sophistication and motivation of the personnel affecting the forced entry.
Absolute penetration resistance from forced entry by a determined and well-equipped attack group is impossible.
Aggressor groups range from unsophisticated criminals and vandals to organized criminals.
Attempts to force an entry may be thwarted by increasing the time necessary to affect such an entry and by early detection. Intrusion sensors positioned as far as possible from the protected environment in conjunction with optimal structural and component design will maximize the time available for a response force to intercept the intruders.
The procedures of this test method are intended to evaluate the time necessary for vandals and unsophisticated criminals to forcefully penetrate security fence systems by using manually operated tools-defined as a low, medium, or aggressive forced entry threat.
View Less