UNLIMITED FREE ACCESS TO THE WORLD'S BEST IDEAS

close
Already an Engineering360 user? Log in.

This is embarrasing...

An error occurred while processing the form. Please try again in a few minutes.

Customize Your Engineering360 Experience

close
Privacy Policy

This is embarrasing...

An error occurred while processing the form. Please try again in a few minutes.

ASTM D6106

Standard Guide for Establishing the Nomenclature of Ground-Water Aquifers

inactive
Buy Now
Organization: ASTM
Publication Date: 10 August 1997
Status: inactive
Page Count: 17
ICS Code (Hydraulic construction): 93.160
ICS Code (Civil engineering (Vocabularies)): 01.040.93
scope:

This guide covers a series of options but does not specify a course of action. It should not be used as the sole criterion or basis of comparison and does not replace or relieve professional judgement.

This guide contains instructions and suggestions for authors of ground-water (hydrogeologic) reports in assigning appropriately derived and formatted aquifer nomenclature. Discussed are the water-bearing units that may require name identification, which are, ranked from largest to smallest, aquifer system, aquifer, and zone. Guidance is given on choosing the source of aquifer names, those are from lithologic terms, rock-stratigraphic units, and geographic names.

Included are examples of comparison charts and tables that can be used to define the hydrogeologic framework. Illustrations of eleven different hypothetical aquifer settings are presented to demonstrate the naming process.

Categories of items not suggested as a source of aquifer names are reviewed because, although they should be avoided, they occur in published documents. These categories are the following: time-stratigraphic names, relative position, alphanumeric designations, depositional environment, depth of occurrence, acronyms, and hydrologic conditions.

Confining units are discussed with the suggestion that these units should not be named unless doing so clearly promotes an understanding of a particular aquifer system. Suggested sources of names for confining units correspond to those for aquifer names, which are lithologic terms, rock-stratigraphic units, and geographic names.

It is suggested that in reports that involve hydrogeology, the author should consider first not naming aquifers (see 6.2).

Format and expression styles are assessed along with the general cautions related to name selection of aquifers and confining units.

This guide is a modification of a previously published report (1).(Footnote 2)

This guide offers an organized collection of information or a series of options and does not recommend a specific course of action. This guide cannot replace education or experience and should be used in conjunction with professional judgment. Not all aspects of this guide may be applicable in all circumstances. This guide is not intended to represent or replace the standard of care by which the adequacy of a given professional service must be judged, nor should this guide be applied without consideration of a project's many unique aspects. The word "Standard" in the title of this document means only that the document has been approved through the ASTM consensus process.

Footnote 2 - The boldface numbers in parentheses refer to the list of references at the end of this standard.

Document History

August 10, 1997
Standard Guide for Establishing Nomenclature of Ground-Water Aquifers
This guide covers a series of options but does not specify a course of action. It should not be used as the sole criterion or basis of comparison and does not replace or relieve professional...
August 10, 1997
Standard Guide for Establishing the Nomenclature of Ground-Water Aquifers
1. Scope 1.1 This guide offers a series of options but does not specify a course of action. It should not be used as the sole criterion or basis of comparison and does not replace or relieve...
ASTM D6106
August 10, 1997
Standard Guide for Establishing the Nomenclature of Ground-Water Aquifers
This guide covers a series of options but does not specify a course of action. It should not be used as the sole criterion or basis of comparison and does not replace or relieve professional...

References

Advertisement