UNLIMITED FREE ACCESS TO THE WORLD'S BEST IDEAS

close
Already an Engineering360 user? Log in.

This is embarrasing...

An error occurred while processing the form. Please try again in a few minutes.

Customize Your Engineering360 Experience

close
Privacy Policy

This is embarrasing...

An error occurred while processing the form. Please try again in a few minutes.

IEEE - 1804

Fault Accounting and Coverage Reporting (FACR) for Digital Modules

active, Most Current
Organization: IEEE
Publication Date: 6 December 2017
Status: active
Page Count: 29
scope:

This standard formalizes aspects of the stuck-at fault model as they are relevant to the generation of test patterns for digital circuits. Its scope includes a) fault counting, b) fault classification, and c) fault coverage reporting across different automatic test pattern generation (ATPG) tools, for the single stuck-at fault model. Fault grading and simulation is limited to the Verilog gate level representation of a digital circuit. With this standard, it shall be incumbent on all ATPG tools (that comply with this standard) to report fault coverage in a uniform way. This can facilitate the generation of a uniform coverage (and hence a test quality) metric for large chips with different cores and modules, for which test patterns have been independently generated using an ATPG tool, or have been supplied externally and have been simulated using an ATPG tool to ascertain the fault coverage.

Purpose

Digital circuits have various structural representations either in high-level hardware description languages (HDLs), which can then be synthesized, or in netlist forms. Commercial tools today for ATPG, using algorithmic techniques, operate on a structural netlist of the design under test (DUT). The test quality signoff process mandatorily includes a minimal coverage requirement, to be obtained using these ATPG tool generated patterns on the DUT. This motivates the need for standard processes for:

a) counting faults across different fault models

b) classifying these faults

c) reporting the coverage across different ATPG tools that are used to generate test patterns for these digital circuits

Such standard processes should enable test qualification based on ATPG tool generated patterns and based upon fault coverage metrics in a uniform way and independent of the ATPG tool used. A uniform fault coverage and pattern count based metric can now be generated for large chips with complex functionality. Such metrics are commonly used in today's system-on-chips (SOCs) with a heterogeneous mix of modules therein, often consisting of intellectual property (IP) cores (which are often sourced from design teams different from those designing the chips themselves), and test patterns which are generated using different ATPG tools. This points to the need for such a standard.

This standard can help to build consensus among the chip designers, tool vendors, and end customers of integrated circuits. The coverage metrics reported by the designers shall be consistent across all tools. Coverage requirements set by the customers can now also be uniformly targeted by the designers, independent of the ATPG tool used. The standard can also help in merging coverage reports from different tools when different IPs are integrated into an SOC.

In the first version of this standard, only the classical stuck-at fault model is considered.

The following are outside the scope of this document:

- Standards on ATPG algorithms, ATPG efficiency (speed, memory), fault grading efficiency, fault models other than the stuck-at fault model, and test vector compaction

- Standards on how a gate-level netlist is created for a design

Document History

1804
December 6, 2017
Fault Accounting and Coverage Reporting (FACR) for Digital Modules
This standard formalizes aspects of the stuck-at fault model as they are relevant to the generation of test patterns for digital circuits. Its scope includes a) fault counting, b) fault...

References

Advertisement