UNLIMITED FREE
ACCESS
TO THE WORLD'S BEST IDEAS

SUBMIT
Already a GlobalSpec user? Log in.

This is embarrasing...

An error occurred while processing the form. Please try again in a few minutes.

Customize Your GlobalSpec Experience

Finish!
Privacy Policy

This is embarrasing...

An error occurred while processing the form. Please try again in a few minutes.

NEN-EN-ISO 6647-2

Rice - Determination of amylose content - Part 2: Routine methods

inactive
Organization: NEN
Publication Date: 1 May 2013
Status: inactive
Page Count: 19
ICS Code (Cereals, pulses and derived products): 67.060
scope:

NEN-EN-ISO 6647-2 specifies a simplified routine method for the determination of the amylose content of milled, non-parboiled rice in the range from 1 % to 30 %. Rice samples for which the amylose content has been determined by the reference method size exclusion chromatography (SEC) are used as standards to generate the calibration curve.

Document History

June 1, 2015
Rice - Determination of amylose content - Part 2: Routine methods
NEN-EN-ISO 6647-2 specifies a simplified routine method for the determination of the amylose content of milled, non-parboiled rice in the range from 1 % to 30 %. Rice samples for which the amylose...
NEN-EN-ISO 6647-2
May 1, 2013
Rice - Determination of amylose content - Part 2: Routine methods
NEN-EN-ISO 6647-2 specifies a simplified routine method for the determination of the amylose content of milled, non-parboiled rice in the range from 1 % to 30 %. Rice samples for which the amylose...
September 1, 2007
Rice - Determination of amylose content - Part 2: Routine methods
This part of ISO 6647 specifies two simplified routine methods for the determination of the amylose mass fraction of milled rice, non-parboiled. The main difference between the two methods is the...
October 1, 2005
Rice - Determination of amylose content - Part 2: Routine method
This part of ISO 6647 specifies two simplified routine methods for the determination of the amylose mass fraction of milled rice, non-parboiled. The main difference between the two methods is the...
Advertisement